Equities
RavenPack | November 14, 2017
In this study, we demonstrate how RavenPack Analytics can be predictive of stock performance after neutralizing the exposure to MSCI Barra risk factors.
Executive Summary:
We move beyond excess returns to consider specific returns in a daily strategy which improves risk-adjusted performance driven by both higher returns and lower volatility.
Experimental Stats. Comparison between MSCI specific returns and excess returns for a set of statistics. Results are shown for USFAST model for Large/Mid-Cap and Small-Cap. Source:RavenPack, MSCI, November 2017.
Details on the methodology used for the strategy and on the achieved results:
For simplicity, researchers often use excess returns when evaluating the efficacy of a trading signal. This is equivalent to assuming just a single risk factor (the market) with constant factor exposure (𝛽=1). However, in reality, several other risk factors exist and exposure not only differs across time but also across assets. This can lead to erroneous conclusions when it comes to signal performance, both in terms of returns and volatility.
To truly isolate the effects of a given trading signal, we need to account for the contribution from a broader set of risk factors and ensure that any observed performance cannot be explained by known risk premia.
In particular, we move beyond excess returns to consider the specific returns as defined by several distinct MSCI Barra risk models . This is done as a convenient shortcut to a factor-neutral portfolio implementation. In this context, we evaluate the effect of applying a regional model vs. a global model (USFAST/ USMED vs. GEM3), and faster vs. slower factors (USFAST vs. USMED).
To create our sentiment signal, we take a 1-day average of RavenPack’s Event Sentiment Score (ESS), filtering on highly relevant and novel events. The resulting sentiment indicator is then used as input to a simple linear regression model with the dependent variable being the MSCI specific returns .
When evaluating the efficacy of a trading signal, for simplicity researchers often use excess returns. This is equivalent to assuming just a single risk factor (the market) with constant factor exposure (𝛽 = 1) – inspired by CAPM [1]. However, in reality, several other risk factors exist and exposure not only differs across time, but also across assets. This can lead to erroneous conclusions when it comes to signal performance, both in terms of signal return and volatility. To truly isolate the effects of a given signal, we need to account for the contributions from a broader set of risk factors and ensure that any observed performance cannot be explained by known risk premia [2, 3, 4, 5].
The use of news sentiment has recently been a broadly treated research subject [6, 7]. In particular, in our previous paper [8], we introduced a simple daily strategy based on average sentiment per company. We showed how companies with positive return predictions outperformed companies with negative return predictions across various investment horizons. In this paper, we aim to build upon this previous study by introducing a risk model to examine the performance of RavenPack sentiment signals after taking into account the contributions from the market, industries, and styles such as value, momentum, size and many others.
In particular, we move beyond excess returns to consider the specific returns as defined by several distinct MSCI risk models . This is done as a convenient shortcut to a factor-neutral portfolio implementation. In this context, we evaluate the effect of applying a regional model vs. a global model (USFAST/ USMED vs. GEM3 in the U.S. and EUE4DUK vs. GEM3 in Europe), and faster vs. slower factors (USFAST vs. USMED within the U.S.). Furthermore, it allows us to isolate the alpha generated by our sentiment signal.
As part of this research, we will focus on three different topics: (1) we will perform an analysis on the different signal implementations using the specific returns from the different risk models; (2) we will showcase the benefits of constructing signals based on specific returns including an analysis on the quantile performance; and (3) we will perform an evaluation of the signal speed or decay. As our findings are consistent and robust across both U.S. and Europe, we will focus primarily on the U.S. region, providing a summary of the European results in Appendix A.
The layout of this paper is as follows. Section 2 provides an overall description of the data used in this research. We explain how to build the reference indicator to predict specific returns provided by the risk models and outline the regression framework we implement in order to produce our trading signals. Results for the various risk-based signals are presented and discussed in Section 3. Finally, in Section 4, our general conclusions are provided.
Please use your business email. If you don't have one, please email us at info@ravenpack.com.
We will process your personal data with the purpose of managing your personal account on RavenPack and offering our services. You can exercise your rights of access, rectification, erasure, restriction of processing, data portability and objection by emailing us at privacy@ravenpack.com. For more information, you can check out our Privacy Policy.
Your request has been recorded and a team member will be in touch soon.
High inflation has returned in developed markets after decades of lying low. In our latest paper, we show how to build an inflation-based asset allocation strategy using sentiment data and we illustrate that sentiment-based strategies outperform models that depend merely on past observed inflation values.
This year's RavenPack Research Symposium brought two intense days of knowledge sharing in London and New York, from 25 top experts in natural language processing, quantitative investing and machine learning. Together, we explored how firms can leverage new language models to generate alpha, better manage risk and respond to calls for more sustainable investment practices.
Human capital is at the heart of value creation. Our latest research demonstrates how unprecedented workforce insights, sourced from over 200 million job postings, can generate more alpha.